How Can We Help?
COBS 19 – Execution and Transmission of Orders – Rules for Best Execution and Order Handling
1. Chapter Summary
COBS 19 outlines the requirements for firms regarding the execution and transmission of client orders, emphasizing the duty of best execution. The chapter ensures firms take all reasonable steps to obtain the best possible result for clients when executing orders, covering factors such as price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution, and settlement. This chapter is a key component in maintaining fairness, transparency, and client protection in financial markets.
2. Applicability
This chapter applies to investment firms that execute client orders or transmit orders to other entities for execution in the course of MiFID business. It primarily concerns retail and professional clients but may exclude eligible counterparties in some contexts. The best execution obligations apply broadly to relevant regulated activities under MiFID.
3. Key Rules and Their Meaning
- COBS 19.1.1R – Best Execution Obligation Firms must take all sufficient steps to obtain the best possible result for clients when executing orders, considering price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, size, nature, or any other relevant consideration. In practice: Firms must have policies and procedures to ensure and demonstrate how they deliver best execution tailored to each order and client.
- COBS 19.2.1R – Execution Policy Disclosure Firms must establish, implement, and disclose to clients their order execution policy, including the venues and factors considered in order execution. Meaning: Transparency allows clients to understand how their orders will be handled and where they will be executed.
- COBS 19.3.1R – Monitoring and Reviewing Execution Quality Firms are required to regularly monitor the effectiveness of their execution arrangements and policies and review them at least annually. Nuance: This ensures ongoing compliance and adaptation to market changes or new venues.
- COBS 19.4.1R – Client Consent and Specific Instructions If a client provides specific instructions on how to execute an order, firms must execute the order following those instructions even if it might not result in best execution by default. Meaning: Client autonomy is respected but may limit the firm’s best execution obligation.
- COBS 19.5.1R – Transmission of Orders When transmitting orders to another entity for execution, firms must take reasonable steps to ensure the third party complies with best execution principles. In practice: Firms remain responsible for client outcomes, requiring due diligence on execution brokers or venues.
4. Interpretation Notes / FCA Expectations
- The FCA expects firms to adopt a client-centric approach, documenting how their execution policies meet best execution requirements.
- Guidance clarifies that best execution is holistic, not just about price but considering the totality of order execution factors.
- The FCA emphasizes that firms must document, monitor, and report on best execution to demonstrate compliance.
- Firms are expected to disclose execution policies clearly and obtain client consent where applicable.
- Specific client instructions override the general best execution obligation, but firms should still manage these orders prudently.
5. Practical Considerations for Firms
- Develop and maintain a comprehensive order execution policy that identifies execution venues and factors considered.
- Implement systems for monitoring execution quality, including data collection, analysis, and reporting.
- Provide clear disclosures to clients about execution policy and obtain consent if execution deviates from standard best execution processes.
- Maintain robust due diligence and oversight of third-party execution venues or brokers when transmitting orders.
- Train staff on best execution principles and ensure policies are reviewed and updated regularly.
6. Related Handbook References
- COBS 11 – Client Order Handling and Aggregation
- COBS 10 – Client Communications (disclosures to clients)
- SYSC 10 – Systems and Controls (internal governance)
- PRIN 2A – FCA Principles (integrity, due care, client interests)
- MIFIDPRU – MiFID prudential requirements related to order execution risk
7. Regulatory Focus / Enforcement Risk
- Best execution failures are a frequent FCA enforcement focus due to potential client detriment, especially concerning order handling transparency and execution quality.
- Firms are scrutinized on adequacy of policies, monitoring effectiveness, and client disclosures.
- Inadequate due diligence on execution venues or failure to act on monitoring findings increases enforcement risk.
- FCA expects firms to be proactive and transparent in remediation of any execution deficiencies.